![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
ISSUE
53 FEATURES
Editorial.
DIRK
HEENE 'European Traditionalist'.
Interview
By Mike Fedyk.
Letters
to the Editor.
Shotokan
has 'NOT' changed. By John Cheetham.
Improve
your close quarter skills (Part Three).
By Simon
Oliver.
A thesis
for yondan. 'KARATE NI SENTE NASHI'.
By James
Hartman.
MAKIWARA
'Training Theory'.
By Timothy
Hanlon M.D.
W.S.I.
Summer Camp.
Report
By C. Harrop, C. Worth and J. Cheetham.
ELWYN
HALL 'The Shotokan Dynamo'.
Interview
By Craig Raye.
Fighting
from the ground.
By Graham
Palmer.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cover
Story
|
|||||||||||||
|
By
John Cheetham
After
watching and studying carefully a 1924 black & white movie film, where
Shotokan founder, Master Gichin Funakoshi is seen demonstrating the three
Tekki Kata and Meikyo (Rohai), I personally think that the karate history
books should be re-written! Everything we have read so far from the karate
historians says that Funakoshi used very 'short' - 'high' stances
and the stances we use today in Shotokan bear no resemblance to Funakoshi's
original? As if to suggest that Shotokan has fundamentally changed? Not
So!
On this
movie film from 1924 (two years after Funakoshi arrived in Japan) I can
unequivocally inform all Shotokan practitioners that Master Funakoshi's
stances are as long and deep as any present day Japanese Master.
Shotokan
has 'NOT' changed!
Probably
as he got older and started having hip problems, his stances became a
lot shorter and higher (as seen in most photographs of Master Funakoshi)
but this unarguable, concrete physical evidence of Funakoshi's karate
from his first years in Japan proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Shotokan
stances have always been deeper and longer than most other styles, as
they are today. The reasons for this could be numerous but two simple
theories are that: (1) deep stances have a profound effect on the training
and strengthening of the leg/hip muscles and: (2) having a low centre
of gravity when delivering upper body techniques greatly increases the
power in the blows and stability on impact.
It would
be fair to say that judging by this movie film, that you can see how the
Japan Karate Association (JKA) later refined and developed Funakoshi's
karate but certainly did not 'change' it. This development and progress
was largely due to their (JKA's) research and study of 'body dynamics'
and a more scientific, biomechanical development. This can be seen in
the classic Shotokan books, 'Karate the Art of Empty Hand Fighting' by
Nishiyama (1960) and 'Dynamic Karate' by Nakayama (1966). Again I say
that the three basic stances (zenkutsu dachi - kiba dachi - kokutsu dachi)
are no different in these books from the stances used by Funakoshi in
this early film.
Shotokan
has 'NOT' changed!
I think
that this point about the depth and length of the three basic stances
in Shotokan is of vital 'historical' importance, because it means that
we have not fundamentally 'changed' Shotokan from the way the founder
(Funakoshi) used to perform his karate, when he first moved to Japan in
1922. This physical evidence was filmed at Keio university in Tokyo, at
what was probably the first ever summer training camp in karate's history.
Many (if
not all) Shotokan people will be pleased with this new information, but
there will be a few 'red faces' amongst the karate historians! It does
sometimes cause concern and confusion when students think that the stances
in Shotokan were originally very high and short. This film proves this
'totally' incorrect. In fact Master Funakoshi's back stance in kata -
Meikyo is particularly long and deep and his forward stance and kiba dachi
are no different from the norm, or those demonstrated in the Nakayama
or Nishiyama books. (Look at the photographs from Nakayama's 'Best Karate'
Vol.1 below, Gichin Funakoshi's stances were as long and deep as this
on the old film). The old movie film is not good quality but this 'is'
Master Funakoshi. This has been certified by Master Hidetaka Nishiyama
9th Dan, a living, direct student of Gichin Funakoshi.
Shotokan has 'NOT changed! All three
of Master Funakoshi's Tekki kata look very strong and particularly his
stance (kiba dachi) remains rock solid throughout all three Tekki kata.
There is great use of body dynamics, utilising rotational movement from
the hips and waist to really turn and twist the torso in the elbow strikes,
blocks and punches. There are some 'slight' variations in the kata. For
instance some of the blocks which are nowadays performed slowly, are done
fast on this film and there was no 'bow' (rei) before, or at the end of
the kata. That must have been introduced at a later date? Maybe when Funakoshi
observed the Japanese culture. The nami ashi which appears in Tekki shodan
is more like a very high knee lift and fumikomi (stamping kick). The older
version of Tekki sandan is demonstrated (the same version as performed
by Nakayama sensei on the 1960 kata films. SKM Video club Tape 3) and
in Tekki Nidan there is no knee lift on the second movement, but generally
there are no great differences in these three Tekki kata from today. The
biggest differences are in the timing of some of the movements in the
various kata but this still occurs today from one master to another. It's
a matter of personal interpretation, as with classical music and other
arts. For instance present day masters like Kanazawa sensei use different
timing in certain kata from Enoeda sensei or Shirai sensei and so on.
The techniques and embusen line are 'exactly' the same, but there are
variations in the timing of the movements. This will always be the case.
This is 'Art'.
On the
1924 film in Funakoshi's Meikyo kata, again the timing is slightly different
from most of today's versions but the techniques used and direction (embusen
line) are identical. For instance the gedan barai on the third movement
is done quite slowly but the double gedan barai later in the kata (which
is usually performed slowly nowadays) is done at fast, application speed.
This is a point worth thinking about because obviously blocks would be
applied (by necessity) at speed in application. However, in many kata
we perform slow blocking movements. Maybe this was introduced for practice
of body control, breathing and to understand contraction and expansion
of the muscles? It would be very interesting to hear what the senior Japanese
sensei's explanations would be for the reasons behind 'slow' blocks in
kata?
Also on
the film a senior student of Master Funakoshi (it could be a very young
Egami sensei) demonstrates kata - Enpi and his basic stances (zenkutsu,
kokutsu and kiba dachi) are particularly long and deep even by today's
standards. Shotokan has 'NOT' changed!
I don't
know how the historians will explain this away. Hopefully they will concede
that they made a 'mistake' by solely relying on photographic evidence?
They will probably come up with some excuse for sure! That will be worth
hearing!?
Bearing
in mind that this is a very old movie film, you can get a fair idea of
what Funakoshi's karate was actually like. Compared to today, (with the
very greatest respect, of course), it appears a little 'wooden' but the
Master shows good agility in the jump in Meikyo and his Tekki kata are
very good and very powerful looking techniques and terrific stance.
He must
have been about fifty four years old at the time. Funakoshi's (Shotokan)
karate has fundamentally not changed, it's just progressed, been refined
and developed. We have heard this said by all the most senior Japanese
instructors, people who are old enough to have actually trained with Master
Funakoshi, people like Nishiyama sensei, Sugiura sensei and Okazaki sensei
to name but three living examples.
Shotokan
has 'NOT' changed!
I showed
this film to Sensei Frank Cope 6th Dan, one of the longest practicing
karateka in Europe and he was amazed by Master Funakoshi's stances and
particularly his Kiba dachi during the three Tekki kata. Frank was really
impressed by the solidness of his kiba dachi when performing the upper
body techniques from the three Tekki kata and how good his hip and torso
movement was without his stance even flinching or buckling one inch.
This film
was obtained through the dedicated, tireless work of American karate historian,
Shotokan karate-ka and Kendo-ka, Mr.David Palumbo, from Rhode Island,
New York.
Most people
have so far credited Funakoshi's son, Yoshitaka as introducing lower,
deeper stances into Shotokan. Yet this film totally proves that Master
Gichin originally used low stances before his hip problems. Yoshitaka
pioneered the use of Fudo-dachi as used in Sochin kata.
The film
has been made available on Video by Don Warrener (Masterline Video Production
Inc. 5 Columbia Drive, Niagara Falls, New York 14305). I can't in all
honesty put my 'hand on heart' and say rush out and buy this half hour
tape because apart from a couple of priceless historic minutes featuring
Master Gichin Funakoshi on film, (you can't see his face too well) the
rest of the film shows university students at a summer camp and some other
karateka of very average standard doing a few sections from various kata.
There is some later footage from around 1932 of Shotokan students training
on a beach and again, interestingly, although these people are not of
a very good standard technically, their stances are certainly as long
and deep as any seen, generally, in Shotokan Karate throughout the world
today!
Shotokan
has 'NOT' changed!
|
|||||||||||||
|
CONTACTING
SKM
EDITORIAL
ADDRESS: S.K.M. P.O. Box 53, Lymm, Cheshire, WA13 0HH. U.K.
TELEPHONE
& FAX No. + 44 (0) 1925 755047.
E-Mail
"john@skmag.demon.co.uk"
SHOTOKAN
KARATE MAGAZINE IS PUBLISHED QUARTERLY, BY SKM PUBLICATIONS. (FEB. MAY.
AUG. NOV.)
All
material whole or part in Shotokan Karate Magazine is subject to Copyright
and must not be reproduced in any form without the consent of the Editor.
S.K.M. reserves the right to refuse to publish certain material, both
Editorial and Advertising. World Copyright ©1984-1998 All rights
reserved.
DISCLAIMER.
The views and opinions of Letter writers and authors of Articles are not
necessarily those of the Editor or SKM. The magazine therefore accepts
no responsibility for any critical statements or sentiments, technical
or medical opinions contained in their editorial.
|
|||||||||||||